Full Name of
Assessment:
|
Vineland -II
|
||
Author, Publisher,
Date:
|
Author(s): Sara S. Sparrow, Domenic V. Cicchetti
& David A. Balla; Pearson; 2005
|
||
Source:
|
http://psychcorp.pearsonassessments.com/HAIWEB/Cultures/en-us/Productdetail.htm?Pid=Vineland-II
|
Pricing: Vineland-II Training CD: $ 115
|
|
Brief description
(purpose, domains, subscales, time to
administer, space/equipment needs):
Purpose:
The Vineland-II is a standardized
norm-referenced assessment tool that can be used for:
measuring
an individual's daily functioning
measuring
deficits in adaptive behavior
clinical
diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders
delays,
emotional and behavioral disturbances as well as other mental, physical or
injury
related conditions
developmental
evaluations
progress
monitoring
program
planning
research
Domain:
The Vineland-II consists of 5 domains
each with subdomains. The manual lists the following description of the vineland-II
communication
domain
◦
receptive
◦
expressive
◦
written
daily
living skils domain
◦
personal
◦
domestic
◦
community
socialization
domain
◦
interpersonal relationships
◦
play and leisure time
◦
coping skills
motor
skills domain
◦
gross motor
◦
fine motor
maladaptive
behavior domain (optional)
◦
maladaptive behavior index
◦
maladaptive behavior critical items
◦
adaptive behavior composite
Administration: Paper-and-pencil
Completion Time: 20-60 minutes –Survey Interview and Parent/Caregiver Rating
Forms; 25–90 minutes—Expanded Interview Form; 20 minutes—Teacher Rating Form
|
|||
Scoring: the Vineland-II manual suggests that the test
examiners and scorers have graduate training in test administration and
interpretation. A rater (e.g., teacher, parent, and caregiver) should be an
adult who is familiar with the everyday activities and behavior of the
individual being assessed. The rater should also have significant contact
with the individual over an extended period of time. A caregiver could be a
parent, guardian, grand parent, nurse, social worker or other individual who
is close to the person being assessed. Raw scores can be converted to
vineland-II derived scores, standard scores, V-scale scores, percentile
ranks, age equivalents, and stanines. In addition, confidence intervals can
be constructed for scores. Results can be described by adaptive levels and
maladaptive levels. Adaptive levels are descriptive categories which
communicate test results. The maladaptive levels are descriptive categories
in which maladaptive behaviors are rated as average, elevated, or clinically
significant. Individuals with formal graduate-level or professional training
in psychological assessment should interpret test results using the 6 step
interpretation method described in the manual.
|
|||
Psychometric
properties (describe briefly; e.g.
reliability, validity, sensitivity, specificity, etc):
Reliability:
Internal consistency: across
the age groups, the communication domain correlations ranged from .84 to .93.
for the daily living skills domain correlations ranged from .86 to .91. the
socialization domain ranged form .84 to .93. the motor skills domain ranged
from .77 to .90. the maladaptive behavior index demonstrated internal
consistency coefficients ranging from .85 to .91 across age groups.
Test-retest reliability:
average correlations were found to range between .76 and .92 across domains.
Inter-interviewer reliability:
average correlations ranged between .71 to .81 across domains/subdomains
Validity:
test content: the vineland-II
was designed to measure 4 major aspects of adaptive functioning:
communication, daily living skills, socialization and motor skills.
Group differences: the test
developers evaluated measurement bias at the item and scale levels using
differential item functioning (DIF). Difference among sex, socioeconomic
status, ethnic and group membership were found to small.
Test structure: overall,
howerver, the amount of subdomains clustering is modest, implying that there
are functional relationships among adaptive behaviors in different subdomains
|
|||
Citations/References
(source at least 2 articles that
use the tool or reports on psychometrics):
Gleason, K., & Coster, W. (January 01, 2012). An
ICF-CY-based content analysis of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II. Journal of Intellectual &
Developmental Disability, 37, 4, 285-93.
Becker-Weidman, A. (January 01, 2009). Effects of early
maltreatment on development: a descriptive study using the Vineland Adaptive
Behavior Scales-II. Child Welfare, 88, 2,
137-61
|
|||
Comments/critique
(include application to practice – settings, needs, populations):
Addresses
today’s special needs populations, such as individuals with intellectual and
developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, and ADHD
Updated with new norms, expanded age range,
and improved items
Useful for diagnosis, qualification for
special programs, progress reporting, program and treatment planning, and
research
Offers both respected semi-structured
interview format which focuses discussion and gathers in-depth information,
and also offers convenient rating forms
Get the most
reliable picture of functioning: In addition, more test items have been added at the lower and
upper age ranges of Vineland-II.
This provides a more reliable picture of an examinee’s level of functioning
for all ages.
Report to
Parents: Help meet
reporting requirements with this time-saving tool. The Survey Form Report to
Parents makes it easy to communicate test results to parents and caregivers.
Scores and percentile ranks are explained in understandable language. There’s
also space to write in comments and recommendations.
|
|||
Training or certification
requirements:
|
The Vineland-II manual suggests that the test examiners
and scorers have graduate training in test administration and interpretation.
|
||
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Vineland - II
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment